How cultural and linguistc bonds become hurdles in our scientific achievement
We must know that cultural and linguistic events are regional and develop from regional traditions. India is multicultural and multi linguistic country. North India is speaking Hindi, while north east states speak their local languages and English. In Southern India Hindi has no space even credited as National language of India and these people speak their local languages such as Tamil, Malayalam , Telugu etc. Punjabi people speak Punjabi and Haryanvi have different accent than Hindi. Punjabi people have different culture and Haryana has different. Southern Indian have their own culture. So it is very clear that these all is regional.
But Science prevails everywhere and has same truths. We cannot change Scientific Formula to get same results at different regions. To check gravity we cannot change formula to check it at different place.
In India more than 200 hundred languages are spoken. Even the accent and traditions change after covering every 100 km.
The style of turban is different in Punjab than Haryana and Rajasthan. Cultural bonds are habits transferred generation to generation. These are so hard to change due to habitation.
Science always changes the conditions and suggest us to make easy life by changing prevailing traditions and conditions which are unscientific.
We know that tying a turban is a tradition which was the need of sword fighting period to save head. But now it is not need but still it continued due to cultural bonds. Darwin theory decided that every living body is the result of growth and development. But religious / cultural theory is against this idea. This theory says everything is created one day by some spiritual power. Spiritual theory is only a hypothesis which cannot be proved.
Culture and language become hurdle when we transfer data being an interpreter. We cannot discuss everything sitting in a specific cultural bond family. For example in our Indian society we cannot discuss freely the problems of reproductive system. Even one will object the male expert doctor and prefer female doctor to deal with such an issue when it relates to daughter or wife due the traditional rules of morality.
Mostly in our Indian Society we are said to respect elders which not bad, but we have to give not only respect but also agree with every idea he gives us. Mostly being the head of the family his every view or analysis is final. How a person can be perfect in everything. Cultural traditions we have to obey although they cannot be proved scientifically true. Caste and religious systems in India are unscientific in approach. They bond us on sectarian grounds. One has to marry in same caste or in same religion. Social by cot is still in experience.
Post war doctrine which was accepted between 1960s to1970s politically and economically established that Scientific Knowledge is major driving force of innovation and growth. Scholars were agree that Science has unselfish approach and develop knowledge for public good (Popp Bermann 2013).
Disparity between male and female gender is traditional set up. A hypothesis that male runs the hierarchy mostly is a clan’s tradition. How can this be accepted in this scientific era ? Now a slogan of equality in gender is everywhere.
Everywhere in world we see institutions, organizations working on Cultural, religious and linguistic basis to promote their bonds. If these work with mutual understanding with scientific knowledge then these can be fruitful for the growth and development our society but there are such set ups mostly which create hate for Scientific Knowledge to continue unscientific traditions which are very dangerous for the goodness of our society.
Morality is other product of Cultural set up which is also have regional background. The moral rules which prevail in South India that need not have same sense in North India. On the name of Morality many truths of scientific knowledge are rejected.
The question rises that how can we fix the true relationship among Scientific Knowledge, Technology and Society for proper innovation, growth and development. This is a big question mark for all of us. It is a big task for every scholar and academician. The main problem is now our political structure which does every act to gain power. The use of caste and religion is a daily happening phenomena to get votes. The draw backs of democracy are used hooked and crooked without any shame in India. Politicians are working the growth of our society but only to have power to enjoy and make money. This is a bad trend.
Separation of Religion and State
Now a days it must be the burning issue of a state such like India that Religion and state must be lawfully separated from each other. Although, many countries are not allowing religion to interfere  in the field of state. There politics is entirely based on current issues like economy, social set up, ecology, technology or issues related to human rights etc. They think that religion is personal and passion related issue. In any country there may be more than one religion. Supporting any specific religion is very discriminatory.
Atheist and rationalist people does not believe in any religion and have a one third population in the world and will face lot of problems in a state where Religion have upper hand over politics and run the state. Every living human being has the right to live and he can grow and develop in an atmosphere where the human rights are respected. In  State where a single religion has the priority over other religions the minority people face atrocities by the majority.
India is democratic country and Indian constitution have the nature of secularity to behave its people. But what the founders of Indian constitution though for the future of India was never applied.We know that all democratic set up have flaws. Same flaw are seen in Indian politics. From the very Indian freedom day the weaknesses of Indian people were uses to rule India. We know that Indian people have different language patterns ,religions,caste patterns, regional differences and even dress codes and cultures. India is divided society. Even in a same religion Indian people have different sects. South Indian worship Ramayana icon Ravan but North Indian burn its effigies every year on Dushira ( an Indian Festival). North belt speaks Hindi or its related languages and Southern India differs from this. North East people have their own languages.
A gross population of India is related to Hindu Religion and Muslims are on second rank. There are Budhists, Sikhs,Parsies and other religions in India. Indian people are also divided in four Castes such as Brahmins, Kashatriyas, Vais and Suders on the basis of Mannu Simiriti  ( A Hindu law book).
So it is very clear that State like India who adopted democratic set up must rule through a politics bare off any religion. Majority people of India live in rural areas where they have lack of education due to non existence of educational institutions. Even if they have these institutions but there is lack of teachers and if they have teachers they have lack of rationalist thinking and are gripped by some religious thought.
 Rulers want to continue in political power so they use every legal or ill legal method to grab the votes. Now the ruling party BJP which is Hindu based communal party wants to make India a Hindu Rashter (Hindu Nation) which can never be completed without snatching the human rights of other people which does not believe in Hindu religion.Â
We know that the nature of the religion is to put checks of human rights. It can be analysis reading the history of every religion. Even this differentiates between genders. According to religion women have low status than men.
Now the world is run through scientific thoughts but not barely on beliefs which are not acceptable. Ruling Party BJP want run back the country nine hundred year back imposing Mannu Simiriti on Indian people which imposible.
In democratic set up religion have no place. Religion must be left to Brahmins,Passtures or religious people. Religion must be banned to interfere in political arena. The political people who use religion for vote bank should not be allowed to participate in any election. The political parties based on religion must be sanctioned. It will be helpful for the growth of real democracy and human rights will be respected. No religious slogan be allowed to grab vote banks of gullible people.Â
Rationalism and Logic
Rationalism and logic and the relation between them
In the previous chapter we have discussed what is the rationalist thought and why it is needed for progress .Without logic how one can stand for his given idea. We also discussed that the idea without scientific proof is only a idea which have not base to be trustworthy. We see the persons in the society talking uselessly and boring why this happens? And why we don’t we take an interest in his talk and say it is meaningless. But there are persons whom we want to hear with due interest and they make the talk more interesting why it all? What is the meaningless talk? And what is the meaningful talk?
Meaningless talk
This  talking has no logic behind the given ideas by some person. If a person says that the tiger eat the grass then what your response be for that? If such talk is going on by someone then what you will say for that person? you may say that he is fool or ignorant about the reality or have no knowledge about the subject. On which base you declared him so? Not only you but who have the knowledge about the subject will reject his idea and reply that the tiger never eat grass and his food is meat.  From where you get this logic? May be you have experienced with the idea or seen some documentary which proves that the tiger eat meat only. But we know that wrong information may practice wrong in our experience. So necessity is there that which information we receive or perceive must be testified or there must be some sound logic behind this. A follower says his ‘Guru’ so called saint is very near to ‘god’. Some believe only for the sake that they are ignoring the truth or they may have such illogical thoughts same as the follower. What is the logic behind his thesis who says that the his ‘guru’ have near and dear links with ‘god’. The word god is the idea that is without logic. But lot of people in nightmares experience this idea and supposing it to be true. Should we accept this idea which cannot be demonstrated and be proved to true. There may be meaningless experience but have no basic truth. Lot of books have been written by the people having different nightmares .Even in different geographical area the people have their own different Gods. How one may say that his experience is true than the other? What type of logic he may provide? Simple that he has experienced! A experience which is not tested through the basics of science. What we should declare such a thought, nonsense? Yes it is nonsense the idea of a fool and an individual experience which cannot be practice by others.
Meaningful Talk
The question rises that then what will be the meaningful talk? Is it mean that the person what speaks have some meaning. Here we should not take it easy that every talk have meaning. We may say that the talk may have wrong or right meaning. The reason is that what should we take the real sense of Meaningful talk? Meaningful talk has some logic on which we give our consent to agree. What it depends upon the capacity of our brain that how for the speech or talk have some meaningful content. When the talk has some meaningful content then we learn something and some important logical effect we receive and it shall something to advance our growth and development. From the very origin of human species the whole mental growth depended upon logical though. What talk have some meaningful content the man advanced that content and make it more and more meaningful. At that time his food and safety was urgent need for him. So for his food he searched and struggled everyday and in early stage he was non vegetarian but with development of his logic behavior more and more he changed his food according his ease. And now he is both vege or non vege. Now he takes food according his choice and even his some illogical beliefs forbade him to be non vege that may be related to his belief in some religion. But on the other side non vege food is accepted better equipped in quality. Meaningful talk is always qualitative and helps in the advancement of qualitative life. For example a person suggests you that he received enough money by worshiping some god and ask you to do the same, will you do? If you did what is the reason and logic behind this action. Might this suggestion be applicable for all? No, because it was not a meaningful suggestion, a logical person shall never belief on this silly suggestion. But even then lot of people do this, Why? They are confined in their illogical belief and did not dare to come out   of them. They think that if they try to come out then some unknown godly power shall punish them. They are fully engulfed by this illogical thought and are in practice from their childhood. Due to long practice of illogical thought make the person so hard in habit leaving it become to heavy to leave.
Every person tries to provide logic to his talk
Every person provides his logic for his talk to be true. What how long it is true? How we should analysis this to be true or false? Truth is truth and it prevails everywhere and has same effect in results. What the problem is to reach it. Some never tries to search it but follow as others do. This trend is very harmful for our society and put obstacles in its development. This weakness is badly used by others who want to mold the society for their personal or sectarian interests. It is the rationalist approach to go deep in analysis of the truth. We may say it a fact finding approach. Listening the whole talk one should believe that he said everything truth. We must dare to put it on fact finding formula. We know that the logic provided by the speaker may be base on some illogical examples. So through fact finding formula we may analysis all in our mind to know the truth. Sigmund Freud provided his theory to this approach calling it ‘Psycho analysis. What is psychoanalysis, it is fact finding theory to know the brain of others and reaching the truth. We always make some thoughts in our mind through biological process of the brain. This struggle of thoughts helps us to watch everything critically and skeptically. Being skeptic helps us to go deeply in finding the truth. The followers have habit to accept everything what his favorite speaker says. They accept all as a truth without questioning.Â
Rationalist Factor and Logic
Rationalist approach alerts us and guides us to adopt right ideas and leave the false. It is the quality of our brain that in its continuing process of growth it adapts the right and leaves the wrong thought. Rationalism triggers our brain for search of right ideas. This is a natural process to have the lot of changing in our brain from childhood to be adult. When the person becomes more and more logical then we call him mature. Why an emotional person is called Immature? It is  due to his illogical behave. In anger he does such an action which he cannot do when he is in balance of behave, Why? It is clear that in logic he knows the dangers of his action but when in frenzy he is unaware of the results. Rationalist approach rectifies our logic to be more and more correct. When a scientist gives his logic on the basis of his practical work and experiment then we should agree that his logic is last one. Some given the idea that Sun revolves around the world. It was a very new idea when it was given. At that time people were not ready to agree that the Earth is revolving. They were of the view that Earth was static. If the land moves then why they do not fall.  Newton’s gravitational law found very later to this idea. All though ‘The Bible’ adopted this idea and was stuck on this centuries. It was true that the Earth was revolving but It was not true it the center for other planets or even Sun. But the running idea was refined again and now astronomy exposed all the truth and people not only have faith but agree with the truth. So idea and logic are closely knitted and combing both we may find some meaning. Rationalism is the method to refine logic and help us to near and dear to the reality of truth. Some are saying ‘god’ is truth and truth is ‘god’, but when we play with logic and add our rationalist approach then such an idea is easily rejected. Simply a thought without rationalist factor is only a thought or idea of an illusion.
Right idea takes the place of wrong idea
If all the human beings of are to stick on old ideas to which the logic rejects then where will be change in our society? Leaving human race we should watch other species who have adapted to the fixed traits and the live the same life. A bat lives in dark whole for centuries and still is in the same habit. The cow eats grass but not meat still doing the same. All the animals could not learn to make house for them for centuries. The weaver weaves the beautiful nest but the style is same for centuries. But the human race learnt lot of things by making new ideas and replacing the old with these new ideas which he thought is better than the old. All he did due the rapid growth of his mental status. The human brain has no limit to grow and development. This replacing of ideas with the new one took him on this stage and made him the strongest specie of this world. So it is better to learn the real difference of human machine and machine of other species. If we are habituated with old rejected concepts, old irrelevant ideas then how our race shall continue the process to refine its quality for the future set ups? The question is clear that the blind follower should never pay much in human growth. It is the rationalist who is better than a blind follower for human growth. He is always in search of new ideas and test them and applies again and again with all scientific methods.     Â
